Remember how I started with the previous one? The simple fact that there is no deity that would be regarded as ‘a god’, is the base of human knowledge, as all history has shown us that this is incorrect, can only lead to the deduction that the words in the text are not meant as they are translated now. Possibly it has been written in this way, for the same reason in Chinese history many items have been written in poems or verses. I will continue with the replacement of ‘lord god’ or ‘god’ or ‘lord’ with the correct phrase: History (as in what came before and is either oral/written or deducted from the world around, in contrast to pre-history) and the ancestors (all scholars and folkstales that have come before. As such language really doesn’t matter).
In this part, I will however take more time to elaborate on how text would be meant to be read.